India's Path to Global Superpower Is Through Building More Aircraft Carriers
Key point: India has great ambitions and that includes having more carriers, but they are very expensive and hard to build.
With one large carrier in service and another on the way, India has become one of the world’s pre-eminent naval aviation powers. How did the program come about? Where is it going? And what is the strategic rationale for India’s massive investment in aircraft carriers?
The Origins of India’s Carriers
Despite considerable economic challenges, India took carrier aviation very seriously in the years after independence. Unlike China (or even the Soviet Union), India focused on carriers instead of submarines. INS Vikrant, a Majestic-class light carrier, served from 1961 until 1997, fighting effectively in the 1971 war. INS Viraat, formerly the Centaur-class carrier HMS Hermes, joined the Indian Navy in 1987 and served until 2016. These carriers gave the Indian Navy long-term experience in carrier ops, as well as a compelling organizational logic for maintaining a carrier capability.
By the early 2000s, Viraat was showing her age. The supply of second-hand carriers, long dominated by the Royal Navy’s World War II relics, had narrowed considerably. Instead of building a new ship itself, India determined to acquire an older Soviet carrier, the former Kiev-class warship Admiral Gorshkov, which had been out of service since the 1990s. India paid in excess of $2 billion for a massive reconstruction that left the ship nearly unrecognizable, with a ski-jump deck and transformed weapon systems. When accepted into service in 2014, the new 45,000-ton INS Vikramaditya could operate around twenty MiG-29K fighters, along with utility helicopters. Despite cost-overruns and serviceability problems, the ship offered the Indian Navy the chance to redevelop its aviation muscles after years of operating only VSTOL (vertical and/or short take-off and landing) aircraft from Viraat.
Vikramaditya was only the first step towards recapitalizing the aviation wing of the Indian Navy. The second step was the new INS Vikrant, a 40,000-ton ski-jump carrier built in India’s Cochin Shipyard. Laid down in 2009, Vikrant is expected to finally enter service around 2020, with an air wing similar to that of Vikramaditya. The construction process has witnessed a number of setbacks, many of which are to be expected from a first effort at carrier construction.
For the time being, India has decided to stick with the MiG-29K as its primary naval combat aircraft, rather than the Su-33, the F/A-18 or the Dassault Rafale. Both Boeing and Dassault remain at least somewhat hopeful of exporting carrier-borne fighters to India. Even Saab expressed an interest in converting the Gripen for naval service. The Indian Navy also contemplated developing a navalized version of the HAL Tejas, but (for now) has wisely rejected the complicated effort to convert the troubled fighter.
India’s carrier force has developed a three-pronged rationale for its purpose. The first prong is support of a conventional war against Pakistan, which would involve strikes against Pakistani naval assets and land bases. Unfortunately, Vikrant and Vikramadityawould struggle in strike operations because of limitations on aircraft weight, although they certainly would attract Pakistani attention. Second, the carriers make the Indian Navy the preeminent force in the Indian Ocean, better able to command the area than any foreign competitor. Indian carriers will always have better access to bases and support facilities in the Indian Ocean than China, the United Kingdom, or even the United States, and the presence of the carriers facilitates the projection of Indian power and the management of trade protection.
The third prong involves geopolitical competition with China. With the anticipated commissioning of its second large carrier, China has managed to leapfrog Indian naval aviation development in a relatively short period of time. Although China lacks India’s experience with carriers, it boasts a remarkably efficient shipbuilding industry and an increasingly sophisticated aviation sector, making it less dependent on foreign technology. Although India may struggle to keep up with Chinese construction, it can leverage geography (proximity to bases) to its advantage in the most likely areas of any conflict.
What to Expect from the Indian Navy
The next step in India’s naval aviation project will be INS Vishaal, a 65,000-ton conventionally propelled, domestically produced CATOBAR (Catapult Assisted Take-Off But Arrested Recovery) carrier. With experience gleaned from the experience with Vikrant, the design and construction of the carrier will hopefully go more smoothly. It appears as if India will have unprecedented access to U.S. technology for the construction of Vishaal, including the EMALS electromagnetic catapult system used on the Gerald R. Ford class. Unlike Vikrant or Vikramaditya, Vishaal will be able to launch and recover heavy strike aircraft, as well as early warning planes such as the E-2 Hawkeye. Vishaal is supposed to enter service by 2030, although that timeline may be optimistic.
More recently, a spate of rumors has suggested that India might try to acquire one of the variants of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. Deciding to buy the F-35 (and then going through with it) would deeply tax India’s military procurement bureaucracy, however, and would require a great deal of forbearance from U.S. export control officials. Still, the F-35C is the world’s most modern carrier fighter, and INS Vishaal could surely operate the plane.
印度海军航空项目的下一步将是INS Vishaal，这是一艘65000吨的常规推进的国产CATOBAR(弹射器辅助起飞与拦阻式降落)航空母舰。根据维克兰特号的经验，航母的设计和建造有望更加顺利。这么看来，印度将破天荒地获得美国的Vishaal技术，包括用于Gerald R. Ford级的EMALS电磁弹射系统。与维克兰特或维克拉马迪雅不同，Vishaal将能够发射和回收重型攻击机以及E-2鹰眼(Hawkeye)等早期预警飞机。Vishaal航母预计将于2030年投入使用，但这个时间表有可能过于乐观。
By the early 2030s, India plans to have three active carriers. At that point, the next presumed step will be to replace INS Vikramaditya; although lightly used, her hull is already thirty years old, and she will be less capable than the other two ships. If Vishaal is at all acceptable, India’s best bet would be simply to build more of that design, which would allow the capture of construction efficiencies will also enabling incremental improvements. Although the Indian Navy has toyed with the idea of nuclear propulsion, it really doesn’t need a nuclear carrier; the strategic tasks of the navy should keep it relatively close to home, and building nuclear propulsion into the design would result in three different carriers with three different designs, limiting efficiency and co-operability.
India has committed to carrier aviation, and has the resources and experience to develop a successful force. However, India still faces some big decisions, including the choice of a new carrier fighter and the design characteristics of its flagship class of fleet carriers. Much will depend on how successfully India masters the difficulties of large-scale shipbuilding, and how well it integrates new technologies into the design and construction process.
Robert Farley, a frequent contributor to the National Interest, is author of The Battleship Book. He serves as a senior lecturer at the Patterson School of Diplomacy and International Commerce at the University of Kentucky. His work includes military doctrine, national security and maritime affairs. He blogs at Lawyers, Guns and Money, Information Dissemination and the Diplomat. This first appeared in April 2018.
译文来源：三泰虎 http://www.santaihu.com/48443.html 译者：Joyceliu
Instead of nations building these carriers to function as political tools, the $ could be used to do more meaningful good to the people instead, and that goes beyond just India
while they were trying to land on the moon, they had a software glitch, and they could not understand what the tech support guy was saying, so it crashed into the moon.
don't forget to close the hatch before set sail
If India is wanting to be a Global Superpower, they need to build more than aircraft carriers, they will need nuclear ballistic submarines and nuclear attack submarines as well as a good economy to support their population as well as military.
Let India build toilets for its citizens first?
The economy of India is in tanks and wants to become super power with space program while farmers are commiting suicide as they are unable to pay debts.
Global superpower for what? Why does India need anything more than one or two helo-carriers for coastal patrol? Fulblown aircraft carriers are used to project national power over intercontinental distances. Where is India going with this? Invade LA?
India economy is real bad , go nment should help poor people instead of wasting money and starting the weapon race in the region
Sure, let them waste billions per year like the U.S. does. We have as many carriers as the rest of the world COMBINED, for no good reason other than to please military contractors.
And yet, they can't feed their own populace... At least they don't have to go very far to get tech support!
I think India needs to better invest in it's infrastructure before trying to become a "Superpower". The country looks like an impossible s-hole and their money can be better spent improving the everyday lives of its citizens.
Thats pretty much useless as you will need a very strong navy and air force to protect your aircraft carriers. Now these aircraft carriers are obsolete because countries around the world employs hypersonic anti ship missiles, big enough to sink an aircraft carrier. So is it worth the effort to build many? Soon aircrafts can fly long distance, negating the use of aircraft carriers for power projection.
As the world moves on to more modern artilery the extremist terrorist indian hindutva regimen eyes building outdated carriers
"India's Path to Global Superpower Is Through Building More Aircraft Carriers"...flush toilets in more than 50% of residences would help too.
I think India should worry much more about it's untouchable class and getting sanitary requirements up to 1st world standards before they worry about Aircraft Carriers.
May be they will move all the street #$%$ to the new carrier so they can do there business in an open sea .
They should make their own cell phones. 1.2 Billion users and all imported. Feed their Hungry, over 300 millions, more than the population of USA. Yes, I forgot to mention their PM still sits outside in a squat position to relieve himself and recite hanuman chalisa!!
Modi is the new Hitler Indian fascist national go nment has a curfew for the last 42 days with no communication internet and phone services Most of the leaders and over 8,000 Kashmiris are in jail Kashmiris hate India and will soon be free
the poor in India is so opressed that most go hungry for days, what nonsense are they tryingto achieve by sending rocket andwaging war
First Indians needs to build more Toilets, second they need to shower more so that they stink less - Aircraft carrier is very far away
India needs to examine its priorities.
like stop raping children, they do this day in and day out every single day.
they need to have fresh water and toilets so they can stop defecating in the streets.
but they like doing these things and will not stop, so they spend money on things they do not need like trying to go to the moon.
how a country without toilet can become a superpower
To bad for India is that they have absolutely no idea on how to use it.
I thought to India to become Global Super Power, they need to make more toilets.
Do the sailors pee and poo anywhere on the ship like they would in the streets of India?
Indian economy is tanking under Modi the new Hitler
Scott17 hours ago
dude! you're too far fm the signal tower, you're dial up modem ain't making it. no 5G no reception. too bad
ryan15 hours ago
India? LMAO. What, I guess they'll carry call centers instead of arms!!!
Common, more garbage to incite click and comment counts?
Trump's worse fear is that his taxes and/or business records are released and everyone sees him for the lying, unethical loser that he is.
If it doesn't personally impact his ego, he has no concern for it.